So today I read a reply on the ST Forum from the People's Association and it really reeks of stupidity. You can read it here, and I will reproduce it here for archive sake:
I really find this reply super bizarre, and in no place did she substantiate anything. So I wrote her an email, and let's wait for her reply. My thoughts are in the email, so have a good read! Oh yeah, email her too if you want!
#####
From: Kie Zin Teng
Date: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM
Subject: Reply to your Forum Letter
To: ooi_hui_mei@pa.gov.sg
Dear Ms Ooi,
I read with fascinating interest your reply to Mr Muhammad, in which
you tried to explain why opposition MPs can't be advisers to
grassroots bodies. I am sorry but I do not quite see your explanation
there. You just claimed in a sweeping statement that "opposition MPs
cannot be expected to do this", without explaining why. Can you please
let me know why oppositions MPs cannot do this, instead of a sweeping
statement. And you also need toproof prove that only the PAP members are
capable of doing this.
You might have confused the term Government with party politics. The
government currently consists of PAP members, and there will come a
day where it consists of members from different parties as they form
the government of the day. Therefore it is only right for all parties
to be involved in this process. Oppositions parties are not there to
oppose every action of the government, they are called opposition
because they run against the incumbent. If the policies and activities
mean well, oppositions MPs have and will fully support it, hence it
being in line to promote government policies and programmes. I mean
unless you mean to accuse Worker's Party MP as being against dengue
prevention and active ageing, I struggle to see your point.
Which leads me to wonder why is the People's Association appearing to
favour one political party? Look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Scott Teng
Why opposition MPs can't be advisers to grassroots bodies
WE REFER to Mr Muhammad Yusuf Osman's letter yesterday ('Advisers to
grassroots bodies should be elected MPs').
The mission of the People's Association (PA) and its grassroots organisations (GROs) is to bond the community and connect people with the Government. PA and its GROs serve all residents regardless of their political affiliations in fulfilling their role.
Grassroots advisers are appointed by PA, a statutory board. Besides connecting people to people, grassroots advisers are required to help the Government connect with people and help promote government policies and programmes such as anti-dengue and active ageing.
Hence, the Government has to appoint grassroots advisers who support its programmes and can play this role well. Opposition MPs cannot be expected to do this and thus cannot become advisers to GROs.
Ooi Hui Mei (Ms)
Director
Corporate and Marketing Communications
For Chief Executive Director
People's Association
I really find this reply super bizarre, and in no place did she substantiate anything. So I wrote her an email, and let's wait for her reply. My thoughts are in the email, so have a good read! Oh yeah, email her too if you want!
#####
From: Kie Zin Teng
Date: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM
Subject: Reply to your Forum Letter
To: ooi_hui_mei@pa.gov.sg
Dear Ms Ooi,
I read with fascinating interest your reply to Mr Muhammad, in which
you tried to explain why opposition MPs can't be advisers to
grassroots bodies. I am sorry but I do not quite see your explanation
there. You just claimed in a sweeping statement that "opposition MPs
cannot be expected to do this", without explaining why. Can you please
let me know why oppositions MPs cannot do this, instead of a sweeping
statement. And you also need to
capable of doing this.
You might have confused the term Government with party politics. The
government currently consists of PAP members, and there will come a
day where it consists of members from different parties as they form
the government of the day. Therefore it is only right for all parties
to be involved in this process. Oppositions parties are not there to
oppose every action of the government, they are called opposition
because they run against the incumbent. If the policies and activities
mean well, oppositions MPs have and will fully support it, hence it
being in line to promote government policies and programmes. I mean
unless you mean to accuse Worker's Party MP as being against dengue
prevention and active ageing, I struggle to see your point.
Which leads me to wonder why is the People's Association appearing to
favour one political party? Look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Scott Teng

